science vs magic?

Forums ► Misc Topics ► science vs magic?

Re: science vs magic?
By:
Post # 11
Science works on a process of disproving.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: science vs magic?
By:
Post # 12
As well as approving a hypothesis. Science and magick are very much similar, however, science is the lack of thinking about it abstractly rather than acutely. Science neglects the spiritual aspect and skips straight to the facts. There are electron tests that prove that energy manipulation is possible by even looking in the direction of something.

All I'm saying is that science got everything it knew from some form of abstract thinking or theology. For scientists to deny that there is truth in what they thought, is unthinkable to me. You cannot deny somebody else's truth, because your truth says otherwise.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: science vs magic?
By:
Post # 13
simply put:
just because their truth isnt the true-truth, doesnt mean it wasnt a true-truth.

by their i mean ancient abstract theologists (spiritualists)
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: science vs magic?
By:
Post # 14
yes, energy manipulation is a part of science. quantum physics does it with machines, just like we do it with magic. just different methods to do the same thing.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: science vs magic?
By:
Post # 15
Whenever someones asks me for the definition of magick i always voice Aleister Crowley "Magick is the science and art of creating change in conformity with will".
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: science vs magic?
By:
Post # 16
yes yes yes! sorry, bit of a crowely fan ;D
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: science vs magic?
By:
Post # 17
*Crowley, bit... disorientated atm
Login or Signup to reply to this post.