You Wanna Be A Vampire?

and if you look at bones of someone in the past how do you see if blood would be on its mouth and your right the laws of nature didnt change the concept of veiwing it did cause with the tools they had then i dont think they could make theories like the first post did and with the knowledge they had back then alot of things could be mastacken like the plague lots and lots of people even some scientist thought it was uncureable but they were mastacken and the body can still be affected by chemicals in garlic even if its dead and excuse my bad spelling

I apologize, but I literally could not understand what you were saying Wulf. You had NO punctuation in your entire post! The word order was jumbled and very confusing...

And as previously stated...if you believe in vampires and wish to give scientific reasoning behind it, then make another thread.

im not good at writing stuff and if you read slow and took time it would make sense skimming it will make it confusing

and there would be no point to making a new thread cause you would still disagree and do the same thing were doing now it wouldnt make a difference who starts one

we would just be switching places

No, if you made a thread, I would not need to argue...that is what this entire thread did...proved that vampires are not real in the sense that everyone think of them as. I personally will not argue if ou create a thread, but I can garantee that many others will and even call you a fluff.

wulf...it doesn't matter how slow we read post #21 od yours. It doesn't make any sense. Between all the jumbled words and no punctuation, how could it.

You have been offered the opportunity to make a new post defending your assumptions by giving references. Go ahead, if you are so sure of your standpoint. I would love to see it.

Just one thing though, please use punctuation and good grammar.

I don't mean to be rude, but if you want people to listen to your thoughts, they must first be able to understand what you are trying to say.

Thunor, I was commenting on Wulf's post about allergic reaction. Your hypothesis on garlic and mosquitos makes more sense. Not to mention garlic has magickal properties of purification and protection. Medicinally it is used as an antibiotic, antiviral, and antifungal. Based off your post, it would make sense for people to use garlic as a way to fend off disease that such people may carry through a bite. And of course the magickal properties are self explanitory. However, Wulf claiming vampires are "allergic" to garlic is ridiculous seeing that they are people who were ill, or in the mythological sense, undead beings who are invulnerable to all but magickal forms of defense/attack (IE: silver, garlic, sunlight, stake through the heart). Really, how can anyone believe the legends behind vampires to be true in the physical world when they are viewed in a very spiritual way. Back then anything someone didn't understand was spiritual. Illness and disease was demonic possession. People waking up from a coma or sleep paralysis condition were "vampires". And the idea of illness and the decay process was misunderstood entirely.

Oh, okay Raven, I get what you are saying. lol Thanks for more insight into the topic as well.