“Apologies, as far as I knew, it happened on Wednesday. Read the articles concerning the particle accelerator, and you will find that the concerns involving a black hole are unfounded.”
It was an official full-mode test, teehhh, the full run will begin next month. YOU read, or shall I quote it? The project developers themselves said the risks are uncertain, no matter what founded science there is. You want to abject to THEM now, the developers of the project and veterans of physics?
“What makes oyu think that humanity in all it's splendor and advancement would miss something in the water that you can touch and see? We have already mapped out just about the entire ocean floor.”
You’re so certain of the world are you? You’re so certain of what you learn in school right? You’re so certain of what you are told, no wonder your mind is limited and drilled shut. I never saw a so jolly boy like you. Scientists are Gods to you, and you can conclude the whole universe from a semester in science class right? Bhwahahahahahaha! Reality doesn’t work this way. At-least not when you’re trying to contest the paranormal.
“The source I have of ancient myths and legends is the start of Mermaids.”
I didn’t ask for a reiteration of your implication, I asked for quoted sources, can’t you list em’?
It wouldn't be taught in school if it wasn't proven true, and you still haven't quoted your source on science denying Astral Projection. Kepe in mind I have never stated anything about scientists being gods, but their job is to literally explore reality and how it works without a bias. I will quote my own source when you wuote yours. Until then, it obviously isn't needed for me to, is it? Even if they aren't like that, does that somehow make them more likely to exist? I thought not. If you want a source, here you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mermaids
I still don't understand how the Particle Accelerator has anything to do with Mermaids, but if you want, look at the side bar and click on "Black hole production":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_accelerator
It says right there that it presents "no conceivable danger". Now, present the source you have to defend the statement you made involving science denying Astral Projection. There is a theory, the name I can't remember, that states something along the line of the certainty of several different dimensions or plains occupying the same space.
My mind will not be changed tonight, nor will anybody else’s minds, so save it. I’m going to bed, or to relax, whichever. And you can jump around claiming victory, as if I initiated myself into your game, whatever floats your boat.
So, you have no real source of your information regarding to Astral Porjection versus science? I thought so. That never had anything to do with Mermaids anyways. Now then, if you truly have a source for such a claim, then present the evidence or openly admit to being mistaken.
